The Creation
of a Universal System:
Saint-Yves d’Alveydre and his
Archeometer
by Joscelyn Godwin
First
published as “La Genèse de l’Archéomètre:
Documents inédits de Saint-Yves d’Alveydre rassemblés et
introduits par Joscelyn Godwin,” L’Initiation, 2 & 4 (1988):
61-71, 153-166. Abbreviated English version published as “The Creation of
a Universal System: Saint-Yves d’Alveydre and his Archeometer,”
When one opens a heavy folio volume
entitled The Archeometer: Key to All the Religions and All Sciences of
Antiquity; Synthetic Reformation of All Contemporary Arts, something tells
one that it may not quite live up to its ambitions.[1]
Unfortunately the work of Saint-Yves d’Alveydre which bears this
resounding title is not even the work of his own hand: it is a collection made
by Papus (Gérard Encausse) and other “Friends of Saint-Yves”
of some fragments from the universal synthesis that the great esotericist was
putting in order when death interrupted him in 1909. Although it would be
churlish to underrate the devotion of this group, and particularly that of its
leaders, Papus and Dr. Auguste-Edouard Chauvet, it must be said that they were
worried, up to the last minute, about the principles and the coherence of their
compilation.[2]
Thanks to the patronage of Count and Countess Keller, Saint-Yves’ son-
and daughter-in-law and his heirs, the elegant edition of L’Archéomètre,
with its many illustrations and colored plates, appeared in a form more fit for
admiration than for comprehension.
Nevertheless, the serious scholar will know
to refer to another explanation of the system, also called L’Archéomètre,
published between 1910 and 1912 in twelve numbers of the short-lived review La
Gnose: the periodical that also carried the astonishing articles of the
21-year-old René Guénon.[3]
The articles on the Archeometer are signed “T,” the pen-name of the
journal’s editor, Alexandre Thomas (also known as “Marnes”).
They are thought to be based on information furnished by F.-Ch. Barlet (=
Albert Faucheux), another friend of Saint-Yves who had evidently parted company
from the official “Friends.” Guénon supplied some very
erudite notes, mostly on the Hindu tradition.[4]
But all in all, one is at a loss to find any indications of the original source
of this imposing and ambitious scheme. Should one regard it as traditional
doctrine, as independent revelation, as pure fantasy, or as an inextricable
mixture of all these?
For Papus, the work of the man he
acknowledged as his “intellectual master” went, like much else,
without criticism or question. For the dignitaries of the
There is fortunately a third primary source
for archeometric studies: Saint-Yves’ own manuscripts, willed by Papus
(died 1916) to some public library, and eventually deposited by his son, Dr.
Philippe Encausse, in the Sorbonne Library in 1938, as part of the enormous
“Papus Bequest” (including several hundred books, many of them from
Saint-Yves’ own collection).[7]
Our interest here is not in the heap of papers concerning the posthumous
edition of L’Archéomètre, but rather in the scruffy
school notebooks in which Saint-Yves recorded and worked out his systems,
philosophy, schemata, and visions. Sometimes written in a fine, flowery hand, sometimes
in a scarcely legible scrawl, these notebooks reveal a part, at least, of the
events that preceded the elaboration of the Archeometer as it is found in the
printed sources.
The life and work of Saint-Yves have not
yet been described adequately in English, which is a pity since he is often
mentioned superficially. The reader of French needs only to be referred to Jean
Saunier’s indispensable book.[8]
We meet him in 1885, aged 43: the author of a mystical book on Life, Death, and
the Sexes (Clefs de l’Orient), a huge historical study (
1. The Vattanian Alphabet (1885)
2. The Aum (1885-86)
3. The cosmic correspondences of Vattan (1885-86)
4. The Definition of Life (1896)
5. The table entitled “The Heavens
declare” (1897)
6. The Triangle of Jesus (1898)
First
Revelation: The Vattanian Alphabet
Saint-Yves learned this from Haji Sharif
(or “Hardjji Scharipf”), his Sanskrit teacher. Haji came from
Already in the first lesson, which Haji
entitled “Secret and sacred method of a guru for his Dwija”
(twice-born), Vattan was mentioned as “the primitive source of all the
languages in the world.” On October 25, 1885, Haji wrote
Saint-Yves’ name and title in these characters.[10]
As Haji also knew Hebrew (and Arabic), he was evidently the source for the
equivalents of the 22 letters of Vattan with those of Hebrew—crucial for
the Archeometer—and with part of the Sanskrit alphabet.
As for the sources from which Haji got this
Vattanian alphabet, totally unknown to philologists, it is a mystery. Certainly
he belonged to some secret Brahmin society, which Saint-Yves chose to imagine
as a great university, and in the end as the subterranean realm of Agartha.
Could there be some connection with the language and alphabet of “Senzar”
that H. P. Blavatsky and other Theosophists were mentioning at almost exactly
the same time, but which has never been revealed? For Saint-Yves, according to
his interpreters in the Gnose articles, “This [Vattanian]
alphabet, which was the original script of the Atlanteans and of the Red Race,
whose tradition was transmitted to Egypt and India after the catastrophe in
which Atlantis disappeared, is the exact transcription of the astral alphabet
[...] The primordial alphabet of the Atlanteans has been preserved in India,
and it is through the Brahmins that it has come down to us.”[11]
But their presentation of such facts is so much woven in with concepts
reminiscent of Fabre d’Olivet that I cannot believe in them as coming
from Haji Sharif, any more than the fantasies of the underground world which
Saint-Yves wrote as
Second
Revelation: The Aum
The notebooks contain an essay entitled
“On the Aum 1st degree,” and described as the
“Secret teaching of the Brahmins, communicated to me by Rishi
Bagwandas-Raji-Shrin.”[12]
This name may be that of the “other Oriental” to whom several
commentators (Barlet, Jean Reyor, etc.) have alluded; but in the text one also
finds the suggestive words “Haji says...” The essay, which is
extremely complex, elliptical in style, and peppered with Sanskrit, Hebrew, and
Vattanian letters, centers on the cosmogonic explanation of the Sanskrit word Aum;
it also treats the correspondences of the primary sounds of the human voice
with the primary signs of Vattan: a symbolic link of the audible with the
visible. For example, the Vattanian A is the masculine principle; the OU, the
breath or soul; the M, the neutral, temporal, and terminal principle.
The “revelation” consists in
the fact that this alphabet encodes the archetypal realities behind cosmic
manifestation, shown through the cosmogonic analysis of the Sanskrit word Aum,
with the correspondences of the primordial sounds of the human voice to the
primordial letters of Vattan: a symbolic link between eye and ear. A secondary
layer, which could open up many linguistic developments, is the correspondence
of Sanskrit with Hebrew words. But one cannot be sure how much of that came
from the guru, and how much from the pupil, who had already made a thorough
study of Hebrew from the work of Fabre d’Olivet.

Table 1
On the Aum 1st degree
The unity in the trinity: masc. fem. neuter
m
f.
The
the great breath of God, creative soul
and essence the
in the created beings.
and he formed
Wa I BaRa Alahim ath ha Adam: Moses c. 1,
v. 27-28.
The Brahmins say Al-LaHIM the Powerful
among them, and, mystically, say his two principles which, before Creation were
united into a single abode, the Thohou VVa Bohû.
of the Veda Aham, the
● Aum
.
A,
masc. principle. 1st chief, scepter, staff, unity, seed, power.
There,
breath, soul, existence, secret, marvel, terror.
●
Circle, serpent, continuation, measure, time, respiration, expiration, thought,
spirit, death, etc.
Trinity
of functions: father, mother, husband corresponding to water, air, fire. [41']
Science of the mystic
The primitive tongue Veda has been
constituted on the ● . The echo of the ● is
,
the image and resemblance of ● . Thus, the Infinite
,
.
The analysis of this mystic word in the Vedas is written thus
.
The human Being cannot exist without being attached to the soul of souls,
breath of ● . God is the ● , the mortal is the
,
nasal respiration; because other than
,
action and armor, nothing acts but the
.
Hashdi-bibyah
secret name one finds inlaid in all ancient [illegible] of
Vedo-Brahm. antiquity
analysis:
[13]
Hardji says: the supreme breath always present in the breathed. This, he says,
is the mystery of Yôgâ, yogi, yogâm. This is the ihova.
Thus
the ● in its origin has been the neuter Principle, neither vowel nor
consonant, nor sign, an abstract circular dot in the imagination of the human
spirit. [42]
Only
when it has become supreme thought, in order to show itself outside of itself,
has it made its return into itself to show itself in
.
Thus
is the Vasdéva, the abode of God,
when he was hidden in the his Holy of Holies which is the . M’V.
in Vedic elevation exaltation of Being.
This is the Sanskrit
,
by euphony and often
through
,
above, on
male force, and Amoûvi: I am the ●
producing the A, the O producing the I.
The
Vedic compound
would relate to IHOH, and would signify:
The all is breathed or supported by the great breath.
The
Kabbalists call the
the Nicod bila SOPh, the point of the
Infinite, and the , saman hibor, “sign of the
[42'] Secret pronunciation of the
Kabbalists: IhHOuHa of the initiates IaHh-Va-Ha. in order not to pronounce it,
one substitutes IOD Ki for IOD Kyam, eternal Point. Why the point? IOD is
enough. In the synagogues, ADONa-I the Lord I. Adûni, my Lord. ADONa-I
the Lord of the Iod or the Nicod. According to the Manu Veda
as the Cabbalists secretly pronounce it
the day of Kipor, IOM Kipor. Likewise the day of the
: of the complete Aum. The Panditas with
the Bratma and the Yogis bear it as a symbol on their foreheads, toques and
miters, thus
A, H, M, O, H, I. (Putting I in the place
of M: AHIOHI and reversed, 1. IHo-MaHa; 2. IHOHI-A. Moses is written MOShIaH
according to the Misra Sastra Veda lect. 100 Sloka 1. The Kabbalists for their
part say Shem Moshe Sha Ma ha ShiM: There, in the name of Moses, is the name of
God. In writing [43] MOShoH, MOShaH one has IShOH-Ma, Ma-OShi. The rule of
Oshi-Ri.
The Nothing.
in Hebr. אר AiN [sic], means exactly what one conceives
neither as cause nor as essence. AiN KaDMON – AbVaT the primitive non
being would be the Anterior to the universe, Pourvalokam, anterior even to the
wisdom Jajnanas on which the world was founded.
Jajnanas indicates the
e.
Moshi, a name that sacerdotally made the
Title of Pharaoh given to Moses[14]
MOShI-Hah say the Sastras[15]
BaRAShITh
movement
: Dêvyo Brasthananta gâtis.
The movement of the incessant divine march, the Circle of Life.
What is the essence of Wisdom, how, by what
mode is it contained in Non-Being (?) (anteriority) in the supreme crown?
To this question the Vedo-Brahm answers ●
and O
breath of the ● in the masc. Seed
that breathes it into the fem. Principle
.
Third Revelation: The Cosmic Correspondences of
the Vattanian Alphabet
For
his first attempt to align the 22 Vattanian letters with the cosmic archetypes,
Saint-Yves naturally referred to the Sephir Yetzirah, where the Hebrew
alphabet is divided into groups of 3, 7, and 12 letters, the last two
categories corresponding to the seven Chaldean planets and the twelve signs of
the zodiac. There remain three “mother letters,” A, M, and Sh (see
Table 2, left-hand columns). Saint-Yves wrote this system down in his
“Hermetic Notebook,” where the corners of the pages are signed with
Haji Sharif’s monogram, denoting the guru’s approval.[16]
But the pupil was not satisfied.
From
a note in the same notebook, it appears that Saint-Yves was
currently—like many others—consulting the History of Magic
of “Paul Christian” (actually the historian J.-B. Pitois). In that
book there is another system of correspondences for the planets and zodiacal
signs. In a context of practical astrology, but without giving any source,
Pitois aligns them with the 22 major arcana of the Tarot, which he recognizes
as also correlating with the Hebrew alphabet.[17]
Saint-Yves adopted the
letter-equivalences of the first twelve planets and signs (see Table 2). But he
had only to read the titles that Pitois gives to the arcana to think up a
better arrangement from the thirteenth letter onwards.[18]
For number 14, the “solar genius,” why not the Sun itself? And the
15th, “Typhon, genius of catastrophes,” fits very well with the
symbol of duality, the primordial source of evil. The “crocodile”
of Arcanum 0 could be the serpent that devours time, thus Chronos or Saturn.
Whatever his reasonings, Saint-Yves arrived, after a few pages, at a new and
definitive system which would become that of the Archeometer (see columns 4-7
of Table 2).[19]
The
very shapes of the traditional symbols seemed to confirm his choices, as shown
in a large leaf, drawn by a professional hand, found among the papers
concerning the publication of L’Archéomètre by the
Friends of Saint-Yves.[20]
This leaf was doubtless intended to take its place in the finished work. It
comprises three columns, titled “Vattanian alphabet,”
“Derivation,” and “Astral alphabet.” These derivations
were presumably arrived at as a speculative exercise by Saint-Yves, perhaps
with Haji Sharif’s collaboration.

Table 2
The
reader can judge their validity (see Table 2, columns 6-9), keeping in mind
that the derivation goes from right to left; the signs of the zodiac and
planets are supposed to have been derived from the primordial letters of
Vattan.
Saint-Yves
played with these materials for a few months—one cannot say much more
than that. He filled about forty pages of his Hermetic notebook with alphabets,
herbal recipes, messages in code, all rather more magical than Hermetic in
content. In the course of these pages, Haji’s monogram gets more and more
cursory, then, in the middle of a section on “Botanical magic,” it
disappears entirely. Perhaps one can see in this the process of the
guru’s disillusionment to which several commentators have alluded.
Fourth Revelation: Marie-Victoire provides a
Definition of Life
Marie-Victoire
de Riznitch, born 1827, the divorced wife of Count Keller, married Saint-Yves
in
Towards
the end of 1895, Saint-Yves installed an oratory in his apartment on the ground
floor of 9 Rue Colbert, just opposite the
|
א |
ב |
ג |
ד |
ה |
ו |
ז |
ח |
ט |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
|
י |
כ |
ל |
מ |
נ |
ס |
ע |
פ |
צ |
|
10 |
20 |
30 |
40 |
50 |
60 |
70 |
80 |
90 |
|
ק |
ר |
ש |
ת |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
200 |
300 |
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
222 |
333 |
444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
איק |
בכר |
גלש |
דמת |
הנ |
וס |
זע |
חפ |
טצ |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
איק center
of obedient activity
בכר compression
inwards, manifestation spreading outwards
גלש revolution
of the celestial spheres, universal exchange, brewing and mixing of the cosmic
substance
דמת integration
and disintegration of bodies, assimilation and de-assimilation of elements,
fixation and mobilization of souls, astral identification of beings and
migration through the transition of death
הנ such
is life
וס fruit
of the celestial ocean
זע present
agitation in fear of the future
חפ repose,
assured security
טצ temporary
and mobile shelter of mortal man, eternally stable goal of his immortality.
The “words” thus obtained make
no sense in Hebrew. They appear with quite another meaning in the Oedipus
Aegyptiacus of Athanasius Kircher as “names of God” in the
“Saracenic,” namely, Arabic, Kabbalah.[24]
Without a doubt, Saint-Yves consulted La Langue Hébraïque
Restituée (The Hebrew Tongue Restored) of Fabre d’Olivet,
which includes a “Radical Vocabulary” of all the possible
combinations of two letters, and many of three. Fabre d’Olivet’s
interpretations are taken virtually word for word by Saint-Yves, except in the
case of the sixth root, where the earlier writer understands a whispering in
the ear, even a temptation of the devil, that would not fit very well in the
present case; and in the last word, which Fabre d’Olivet says is not used
in Hebrew or Arabic.
For Saint-Yves, this grouping confirmed his
cosmogony, the first three words corresponding closely to the hypostases
symbolized by his three “foundation letters” Aleph, Shin, Thau. And
of course, Marie’s visitation was the experiential proof of life beyond
death. It inspired him to write a poem, “Let the Peace of Jesus, King of
Heaven, be on Us.” Then he started an essay called “Life after
Death.” But he stopped after having written only a few words on the parts
of the human being according to the Egyptians. The next page of his notebook
carries a new revelation.
Fifth Revelation:
Marie-Victoire helps in the composition of the table, “The Heavens
declare.”
This is the most important revelation of
all (see Table 3). It confirms Saint-Yves’ original arrangement of the
cosmic elements (planets and signs of the zodiac) with the Hebrew alphabet, as
arrived at in the Third Revelation. The confirmation consists in the numbers
which result from adding up those of the signs, in two groups of six, and the
planets. Saint-Yves uses kabbalistic means to reduce these numbers and to find in
them archetypal words. For example, the sum of the twelve signs of the zodiac,
565, becomes 5, 6, 5, corresponding to the letters He, Vau, He. These make the
name of Eve, and with the addition of Yod, that of Yahweh. The sum of the seven
planets’ numbers, 469, gives the Sanskrit word De-va-ta, or
“God.”
Finally, by a procedure that some would
class as mere juggling, Saint-Yves succeeds in extracting the name of Jesus
(Ye, Sh, V): a discovery which moved him profoundly, as he relates in the long
commentary below, to which I have applied the title “The Word.”[25]
The
emphasis of this revelation of the Word which created all things in six days is
the key not only to the integration of colors and tones into the Archeometer,
but also to the philosophy behind it: a philosophy that is at once religious,
moral, and historical. Anticipated in Saint-Yves’ Missions and
sketched out in this unfinished commentary, it finds its fullest expression in
the essay “La Sagesse vraie” which prefaces L’Archéomètre.

Table 3
Saint-Yves
drew the table which he entitled “Coeli enarrant” (The heavens
declare) twice in his Hermetic notebook.[26]
He followed the first version with a Sanskrit alphabet, ecstatic exclamations
such as “Glory! Glorify him! Sing, whirl!,” and an equally ecstatic
poem, “Glory! Glorify IEVE, Angels and Gods!” Then he constructed a
circle of the zodiac and its Vattanian letters on which he tried to distribute
the musical tones—seven diatonic and twelve chromatic—and the seven
colors of the rainbow. But he was not yet contented with the result.
The
second version of the table bears the rubric: “Made with my Angel, Easter
Sunday 1897.” What was new here were the numbers and letters beneath the
table, in which, as Saint-Yves described in his commentary, he saw emerging the
sacred name of the Word. The discovery of the name of Jesus encoded, as it
were, in the heavens themselves confirmed the words of the Psalmist: “The
heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament shows his handiwork”
(Ps. 19.1). It gave him the impulse to write the extraordinary commentary in
which one can see Saint-Yves in his philosophic workshop, both oratory and
laboratory, writing at top speed with the red ink that he reserved for his most
important (though also most illegible) notes. Without any care for literary
style, the author’s mind ranges around his discovery in ever-widening
circles. After explaining the kabbalistic derivations, he throws himself into
history—the polemical history that he had published in Mission des
Juifs—with the added dimension of the “Brahmin
universities” unveiled in
This
version of history is marked by Saint-Yves’ disapproval of the way the
Jews abnegated the principles given them by Moses, and by his hatred of the
Romans. These two peoples he reckoned enemies of the ancient Synarchy
propagated by Moses and known to previous civilizations, whose key and
essential symbols he believed himself to have rediscovered.
The
commentary then addresses music. No subject gave Saint-Yves more trouble than
speculative music: over the succeeding years he filled hundreds of pages with
notes, mostly on the problems of finding a tuning of the scale that would agree
with the sacred numbers. The culmination of this quest is the musical
“ruler” in L’Archéomètre (page 263) for
which he even took out a patent, intending it to be used by artists, designers,
and architects to make their work properly archeometric. It bears all the
diatonic, chromatic, and enharmonic tones, assigned their tuning-numbers within
the framework of the apocalyptic number 144,000, which may actually have been
the result of a further (seventh) revelation—the last of which I have
found any mention—on November 1, 1901.[28]
But at this point, in 1897, Saint-Yves was limited to making the planets correspond
with the tones of the diatonic scale. He took as his basis the same system as
Fabre d’Olivet had used, generally attributed to the Egyptians on the
authority of Dio Cassius:
Moon =
A, Mercury = G, Venus = F, Sun = E, Mars = D, Jupiter = C, Saturn = B.
In
the notes following the essay “The Word,” Saint-Yves took the
crucial decision that was the natural reflection of the Six Days’
creation: he substituted the hexad for the heptad. In returning to his work on
the correspondences of tones and colors with the zodiacal circle, he worked
henceforth with six, instead of with seven. He abandoned the rainbow, to which
Now
the majority of elements of the Archeometer were assembled, without yet being united
in a single diagram. They were the following:
1. The zodiacal circle
2. The planets, placed according to their rulerships
3. The twelve Hebrew/Vattanian letters corresponding to the signs of
the zodiac
4. The seven letters corresponding to the planets
5. The numbers corresponding to these nineteen letters
6. The six or seven tones, A, G, F, (E), D, C, B
7. The six colors arranged in a six-pointed star.
The
Word
I
am the ברא-שית said JeShV, as he also said I am the א and the ת.
This
affirmation of the Word incarnate cannot not be uttered by the creative word,
divine, angelic, cosmogenic, and cosmological, absolute basis of the Word and
the life in us men and in everything.
The
sum of the Elohim of the middle column opposite, the total of the numbers of
their living letters, of their spheres, organic and biogenic, both in the
fluid-heavens and in their astral-heaven, has given us 469, or in Vattanian,
Vedic, and Sanskrit letters,
4 + 6 + 9 de Va ta, God, Divinity. The
addition of the three letters and numbers 4, 6, 9 gives us 19, the 19 letters
of the three columns opposite or of the ברא-שית of the creative Word speaking through his
creation.
The
sum of the two zodiacal columns has given us 565
, הוה, absolute Life.
The
Universe therefore tells us in its living Word: Divinity is absolute Life. But
to utter the whole NAME, the 19 unite 1 + 9 into 10, on the central column,
which contracts them into itself alone [163'] and the DVT, deVata 469 = 19 has
its absolute union in its God in 10, that is to say in
or י. It is now that the creative Word pronounces, through all the
Angels, all the fluid-heavens, all the astral heaven divinely biologized, the
sanctification of the NAME, the perfect accomplishment of his work, that of the
six divine illuminations, of the six supreme and primordial geneses, in which
nothing can die, in which everything lives again eternally because everything
is constituted in God Life Eternal. And it is only on the 7th day
that the Name is and can be uttered and sanctified by the universal Life united
to its unity. Unity, absolute, indissoluble Life, manifested by the Word in
Universality, infinite Life, enjoys all of its Gift of divine Love, given,
received, and returned in the Adoration; and in this absolute, infinite,
eternal union, Being and Life, Husband and Wife are a single God יהוה.
Here
is what the absolute Word has just proven to us through all its genesic letters
through all their numbers, through all their Angels, through all their fluid
heavens, through all the astral heaven, vivified and organized.
[164]
It is therefore not IêVê who is the ברא-שית at least in a direct manner, because the NAME is
only uttered on the 7th day.
The
6 preceding illuminations are the work of the 6 ALOHIM of the central column
who form it themselves: six on the right, six on the left in the Zodiac of the
Gods of which that of the Heavens is only the Shadow.
But
a Power, the organic Power, the creative Word, the ברא of the 6, has itself created all the אלוהימ and through the Gods all the Angels Aleph-Thau,
living Alphabet of the fluid-heavens and Aleph-Thau of the astral heaven, that
is to say organic Powers, instrumentally organizing functionalities of this
same biogenic Word incarnate in the universe. The Elohim therefore have a
Master, a King of the Gods; and this King is not directly יהוה: it is his Son engendered
from his unity, בריא, from all Eternity, before the heavens, before the Gods.
It
is therefore to the Son, to the Word Himself, that we say his Name in his
absolute Speech.
Let
us examine the middle column. Its dé, Va, ta, 4, 6, 9, then its Ya, Ta,
10, 9, [164'] all return by summation to the number 10, to the letter Y.
Therefore I is the first letter of the King of the Gods, of the son of יהוה who will only pronounce the Name of the Father
after having totally manifested and through all this living manifestation. By
this letter he is one with the Father, consubstantial, co-essential.
The
2nd letter is at the base of the middle column of the 6. Its Angel
has two faces, the one to the rear in the anterior Eternity of life, the other
forward. Its letter is Shin, its star is Saturn, its zodiacal heaven by right
is Capricorn. For there are not two absolute words but a single one, and that
of the Stars relates that of the Heaven of Glory.
All
the patriarchal universities have called Capricorn the Gate of the Gods. It is
through this Gate that at the northern solstice Mother Night is the Mother of
the Savior, and the King of Glory opens the cosmic year.
It
is thus in the astral world, because it is thus in the divine world. The name
of the creative Word is therefore IS, pronounced IêSh in Hebrew. And
since he is the lord of the 6 and, through them, of the universe, there must be
added to his name the letter of the number [165] 6 and this divine Name before
which everything bows, from heaven down into Hell, heaven itself shows us this
and utters it to us in the absolute Speech ישו IeShV, in numbers 10, 300, 6 and by summation 10,
namely again the letter י,
consubstantiality, co-essence with the Father, which must be confirmed thus,
both in front and behind, in Living Eternity.
יש in the Hebrew of Moses signifies the divine Man,
the Hero of the Spirits ישו, the savior, therefore the King.
Anterior
to Moses and his sacerdotal Hebrew, in the triple patriarchal anteriority, in
Sanskrit, in Vedic, in Vattan, I Sh V
signifies the lord of the Spirits, the
King, the Master of the spiritual or angelic world, its sun. In Egyptian I Sh V
has the same meaning.
The
ancient Noachide and pre-Noachide or Adamic patriarchal university had read
this Name in the absolute Speech of the Angels and the heavens as we have just
read it, and they worshiped it as I worship It.
Read
in Egyptian style, from right to left, this name is found in O-Sh I-RIS, and
inversely SIV I Sh V the lord InShV. Read from left to right, in Sanskrit it is
IShU-Ra
Ra, Light, Fire, Motion or [165'] motive
cause, divine desire, prayer.
râ archetypal Gift, sacrifice to
heal and save and redeem.
riah glory and glorification by Gift and
sacrifice.
The
ancient word I.Sh.Va Ra, the lord of Glory, has passed from the ancient Church
whose sacred language was Vattan, to the Noachide or